Saturday, February 19. 2011One Of Those "Where Did The Week Go?" Weeks......John Linton ....which was 'over' before you realised it had started. Of most interest, at least to me, was receiving six proposals for our IP, and in three cases, a portion of our carrier inter-connect circuits as well as our general inter-State links. Times are certainly continuing to change and change more rapidly than in the past. My memory is far from reliable but I think our first IP circuit was 10 mbps in February 2004. Since then the IP has been upgraded multiple times each year to it's current level of 8 gbps today with a further 2 gbps already on order and a complete revision planned to go to 12 gbps - 16 gbps by the end of this year currently in progress. The initial offer pricing from several possible suppliers is quite interesting and it will be equally interesting to see what the Exetel people conducting the discussions eventually come up with. For the first time since we started the company I am not in any way involved in these annual discussions which feels very strange. The main reason for contemplating doubling our current IP is the increasing number of larger business sales our ever growing business sales teams are making. Over the past year there has been a steady increase in business customers buying 100 mbps links from Exetel and the first 200 mbps link was sold in January. The current 'prospect' list has several more 200 mbps companies on it and the first 500mbps and 1 gbps companies are showing, apparently, genuine interest in our IP and data service offerings. Of course all of the prospective customers we find for such services already have current suppliers and those suppliers are very, very anxious to retain that business - but they have the same problem with their IP customers as they do with their data link customers - they have been quite content to rip off their current customers by charging huge money for IP while the prices of international IP has fallen like a stone over the past three years. So if they charged 'today's' prices (let alone tomorrow's prices) to one of their current customers then the 'news' would spread to their other customers in a matter of days and they would be facing a serious financial dilemma. There is a long way to go and a great deal of new thinking to be applied to the decision of just what we do in terms of inter-State back hauls as well as pure international and national IP but it seems to me that major changes will be necessary if Exetel is to continue to be competitive in the business marketplaces in which we currently operate and the new business market places we are thinking about entering. It will also be interesting to see the extent of the lies the drones who pass themselves off as communications consultants working for our competitors now lower themselves even further to say about Exetel. As our very largest (in terms of company size - a huge US multinational) business customer said this week "In the 18 months I have had your service there has been no downtime and no speed issues - I can't say that about my main link provided by an Australian "Tier One" provider which has had three lots of down time in the same period". The other interesting 'event' that came very late in the week was a new approach from the Financial Director of a Singaporean company we briefly talked to three years ago when they expressed an interest in buying Exetel. He has now left that company and is working in his own M and A consultancy. He wrote to us saying he was working for a company that wanted to acquire a company in Australia and if Exetel was interested in selling he would arrange a meeting to determine whether it was sensible to seriously discuss such a proposition. That is the third 'semi-real' approach Exetel has had (ignoring the half dozen or so the 'non-real approaches') we have had in the past six months - something seems to be happening that I don't know about - but then I suppose that is true of my general lack of understanding of most things for the whole of my business and personal lives. Whenever we have such approaches I have always maintained that any approach from an established Australian ISP/Comms company would never be successful because our infrastructure/PoPs would be regarded as of no interest/value whereas a new company entering Australia would regard them as highly valuable if not integral to the purchase. While I doubt the latest approach will result in anything at least it makes more sense than selling out to a current Australian ISP; assuming we could bring ourselves to ever do such a thing. Copyright © Exetel Pty Ltd 2011 Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Any of these proposals for IP include IPv6, or is it still just IPv4??
Comments (3)
v6 is available from most international carriers.
What use is it today when none of the Australian carriers yet support it and virtually no Australian user has v6 addresses? Comments (4)
There seems to be a chicken-and-egg problem. Australian users don't get IPv6 addresses until carriers support them, and carriers won't support them until users have them..
Just wondering if there are any signs that the vicious cycle could be broken... Comments (3)
There is no trouble in getting v6 address blocks and before the end of 2011 all Australian carriers will route them.
What difference does it make to any current users - either now or in the future? Absolutely nothing. When your current or future provider runs out of v4 blocks then they will arrange to provide future customers with v6 blocks. In the mean time you, as a user, has no need for v6 address space as your current v4 addresses will continue to routed 'for ever'and you will have no need to incur the expense of upgrading your routers/switches to operate in dual stack mode. v6? Should only be of interest to APNIC customers as they run short of v4 addresses - it is irrelevant to anyone else. Comments (4)
And if I want to communicate with one of those "future customers" ("peer-to-peer" is more than just file sharing) or want one of those "future customers" to access my web site (which is in my garage)? In either case I need an IPv6 address.
I could rely on 6to4, but the general opinion seems to be that it cannot be relied on to be routed to and from native IPv6. I have a tunnel to freenet6.net (via Canada!!), but I would much rather a "direct" IPv6 service. (and yes: upgrading the ADSL router to handle IPv6 would be an interesting challenge, but I cannot even try until my ISP provides an IPv6 feed). Comments (3)
Take your concerns, which are simply nonsensical as far as I can see, to someone who could possibly advise you better than I can.
This blog is not some sort of personal issues discussion process. Comments (4)
As I told James earlier in the week, our Exetel services are infinitely more reliable than services from Telstra and Optus.
Regarding IPv6, Australia is indeed behind here due to the idiocy of Telstra, Optus, Verizon and AAPT but it still comes up in our business. Sime of our clients are already asking about our IPv6 readiness for when certain large companies finally sort themselves out. Comments (2)
As you know v6 and v4 sit side by side in any end point switch.
It is not a function of the bandwidth its a function of every router and switch on the route between two urls being 'dua stacked' so that the packets can be correctly routed. This, as far as I know, means that EVERY switch in every carrier's network has to be dual stacked for a v6 packet to reach it's destination. Right now and for some many, many months that simply won't be in the case in Australia as well as many other countries - including the USA and much of the EU. The only issue in the future is that a new site only having a v.6 address will not be reachable if any link in the route has no v.6 capability. It would be better to take up these issues with Steve or any sensible engineering forum. I wasn't intending to address this issue at all. Comments (4)
I should have been much more specific as what answers are being sought by our customers - I blame posting from my phone.
Many people ask carriers about IPv6 readiness, and Steve has mentioned that Exetel is ready to provide IPv6 connectivity but cannot source IPv6 transit in the current Australian market. The questions I get asked are focused on my network being IPv6 ready - hosts, firewalls, DNS and process. I suspect that many companies will simply not have considered these (and other) aspects of IPv6 deployment, instead thinking they need not bother until their suppliers can offer IPv6 transit. You're completely correct in your understanding though - switches and circuits simply don't care about what sort of packets are flowing over them. Comments (2)
|
Calendar
QuicksearchArchivesCategoriesBlog AdministrationExternal PHP Application |